Will House Vote to Make Workers Worse Off?
"If Big Labor succeeds in pushing the FLCA through the House, as expected, the Committee will go all out to stop it in the Senate.”
AFL-CIO Boss John Sweeney, smarting over the defeat of the Card Check Scam Bill in the U.S. Senate, told a group of 500 union delegates that “they may have lost a battle over legislation making it easier for unions to organize workers, but they can still win the war by electing a labor-friendly president next year.”
The Cincinnati Enquirer reports:
“We need a bigger majority in the Senate and we need to replace one of the most anti-union presidents of the United States, and I believe we’ll do just that,” he told delegates of the Utility Workers Union of America.
Most critically, Sweeney laid down the law — if you want to benefit from our political largess you will support elimination of the secret ballot election for workers.
“We had no grandiose ideas that we’d get 60 votes. This campaign will end in 2009,” he said, referring to when Bush’s successor takes office.
Sweeney said the AFL-CIO will require any candidate it supports for president to back the bill to eliminate secret ballot elections for union certification.
That’s one litmus test many candidates won’t fail — in the Senate, every democrat supported the bill and its negative consequences for rank and file workers.
"If Big Labor succeeds in pushing the FLCA through the House, as expected, the Committee will go all out to stop it in the Senate.”
The Iowa Department of Inspections, Appeals, and Licensing found that, from 2020-2023, nearly half of the elections that were required to take place [...] simply did not occur.
A handful of short-sighted Republicans are hurting themselves and their own party by failing to cosponsor the National Right to Work Act, breaking pledges they made to their constituents and helping Big Labor keep the legislation from coming to the floor.