Government Union Czars Lose in Federal Court
Mark Mix: President Trump was “right to issue E.O.14251,” which is a significant step in the right direction.
The United States Supreme Court has let stand a lower court’s judgment against UNITE HERE, finding the labor union violated the privacy of thousands of Cintas employees under the federal Driver’s Privacy Protection Act.
The ruling comes after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld a decision finding that UNITE HERE had illegally obtained the license plate numbers from Cintas employees — as well as some of their friends and family members — in order to access home addresses and other personal information. Each plaintiff currently stands to receive up to $2,500.
This is the second multi-million dollar decision rendered against UNITE HERE related to its organizing tactics. In 2006, a jury in Northern California found that UNITE HERE had defamed Sutter Health and its affiliated hospitals during another organizing campaign. The union was ordered to pay over $17 million in damages.
Mark Mix: President Trump was “right to issue E.O.14251,” which is a significant step in the right direction.
Brief emphasizes President’s authority under both Constitution and federal law to reduce scope of union monopoly bargaining control
Labor Board violated federal law and its own rules to stifle Rieth-Riley workers’ statutory right to vote to remove unwanted IUOE union