Federal Lawsuit Hits IGUA Union for Illegally Forcing DC-Based Security Guard to Pay for Union Politics
IGUA union officials provided contradictory information on amount a Master Security guard must pay the union to keep a job
In a case which could find its way to the Supreme Court, justices on the California Supreme Court overturned a 1975 law that barred union pickets on private property. The Court tried to limit their ruling by suggesting that unions could still not use tactics that go beyond “persuasion of patrons to labor’s position.” The decision gives big labor special privileges in California that other groups are not afforded.
This decision is just another example of big labor union supporters contorting the law and the Constitution to justify the actions of union militants. Somehow we can’t imagine that the justices would have taken the same view if the pickets had occurred on property owned by the judges — like their front lawn
IGUA union officials provided contradictory information on amount a Master Security guard must pay the union to keep a job
Largely thanks to the Right to Work attorney-won U.S. Supreme Court decision in Janus v. AFSCME, union bosses like NEA President Becky Pringle are no longer able to block virtually all meaningful education policy reforms.
California’s Big Labor-concocted A.B.5, signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2019, made it almost impossible for workers and firms to bounce back after 2020’s COVID-19 lockdowns. Now Biden bureaucrats want to federalize A.B.5!