Big Labor’s GOP Appeasers Channel Barack Obama
“Under the FLCA [...] monopolistic union contracts would be imposed on employees and business owners after only 120 days of negotiation."
In two recent NMB-run elections, Bristow employees clearly rejected their union overlords. In one election of about 200 eligible employee voters, Office and Professional Employees International Union (OPIEU) union bosses only received only 42 votes to stay. In another with just over 200 eligible votes, the OPIEU union bosses could garner just 78 votes in their failed attempt to stay. (See Images)
These elections supply added examples and evidence that the PRO Act should be rejected, which should be more than obvious by now that the PRO Act does nothing but take away choice from employees and bestows unconstitutional powers onto union officials and government officials. Under the PRO Act results like these could be overturned by union cronies in government agencies and then they could impose unwanted union control over these employees again even though they just rejected the union officials by a democratic vote.

“Under the FLCA [...] monopolistic union contracts would be imposed on employees and business owners after only 120 days of negotiation."
"[Spanberger] voted twice for the so-called ‘PRO Act,’ which would have destroyed the Virginia and every other state Right to Work law, and cosponsored it one last time before stepping down to run for governor."
Abigail Spanberger knows her support of forced union fees as a job condition is unpopular with Virginia’s voters, so she isn’t playing it straight with them.