PRPB Employees Win at District Court; Beat Union Scheme That Swiped Health Benefit from Dissenting Employees
PRPB Employees successfully defend right under Janus v. AFSCME to refrain from supporting unwanted Union of Organized Civilian Employees
This week, the National Right to Work Foundation attorneys are heading to court — the Supreme Court — to protect people like Gary Davenport and a group of 4000 teachers from Washington State who do not want to be forced to join a union or pay union dues and fees as a condition of employment.
At issue is whether the teacher union bosses must allow independent-minded teachers to say “yes” before union fees, collected as a condition of employment, can be used for political causes or whether teachers must specifically object to having a portion of the fees spent for that purpose. Independent observers say a ruling in the union’s favor could open the door to union officials’ efforts elsewhere to roll back limits on the use of dues.
The case and another being heard along with it are Gary Davenport v. Washington Education Association, 05-1589, and Washington v. Washington Education Association, 05-1657. Davenport said he is proud to be the lead plaintiff on the case because he wants to give other teachers a voice and a choice about how their money is spent.
“This has been going on and will continue to go on to those teachers who don’t have a voice,” said Davenport, 32. “They really don’t have an opportunity to defend themselves or protect their own money. They’ve kind of been bullied by the unions.”
Davenport and the four other named plaintiffs are receiving free legal aid from the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation (www.nrtw.org).
PRPB Employees successfully defend right under Janus v. AFSCME to refrain from supporting unwanted Union of Organized Civilian Employees
The landmark Janus SCOTUS case, argued by Foundation Legal Director William Messenger, profoundly strengthened public employees’ First Amendment rights. But it appears the impact of the case is just beginning.
Settlement includes requirement that GSU union inform 3,000+ MIT students of their right to refrain from paying for radical union political activities