National Security or Big Labor Project Labor Agreements

Our readers are well aware of costly and wasteful project labor agreements that eliminate competitive bidding on construction projects to ensure that the project pays a “union wage.”  Members of the House were forced to decide on whether tax dollars should be spent in a competitive manner for defense and national security projects or whether money should be handed to big labor unions instead.  209 members voted to give taxpayer funds to big labor but a majority — 211 — voted to end the giveaways.  It is unclear whether the language survives the final version of the legislation but it is progress nonetheless.  An effort to end PLAs in the last Congress failed.

Related Posts

2021-2022 National Right To Work Act Sponsors - 106 Co-Sponsors

2021-2022 National Right To Work Act Sponsors - 106 Co-Sponsors

Now there are 83 House co-sponsors! U.S. Representatives Mark E Green (TN 07), Earl Carter (GA 01), Eric Crawford (AR 01), Andy Harris (MD 01), and Mo Brooks (AL 05) and U.S. Senator Marsha Blackburn (TN) joined the list of Members of Congress supporting the National Right to Work Act. That brings the number up to 83 co-sponsors in the U.S. House of Representatives and 18 co-sponsors in the U.S. Senate! Are your Members of Congress on this list?
Employees Give Two More Unions the Boot

Employees Give Two More Unions the Boot

These elections supply added examples and evidence that the PRO Act should be rejected, which should be more than obvious by now that the PRO Act does nothing but take away choice from employees and bestows unconstitutional powers onto union officials and government officials. Under the PRO Act results like these could be overturned by union cronies in government agencies and then they could impose unwanted union control over these employees again even though they just rejected the union officials by a democratic vote.