Federal Lawsuit Hits IGUA Union for Illegally Forcing DC-Based Security Guard to Pay for Union Politics
IGUA union officials provided contradictory information on amount a Master Security guard must pay the union to keep a job
[vsw id=”NIQyg3cY8wo” source=”youtube” width=”550″ height=”344″ autoplay=”no”]
On October 14th, while accepting an award for being an uber-liberal, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Union (AFSCME) President Lee Saunders told the audience: We’ve got to send a strong message. Whether it is Scott Walker in Wisconsin – we are going to kick his ass on November 4th.”
He also told the Campaign For America’s Future audience that they need to “Agitate, Agitate, Agitate – it’s time to get back to the basics.”
Saunders in your face attitude is less shocking when you realize, as he told the audience, that his mother was a community organizer trained by Saul Alinksy who taught people to bring about change by creating social disorder.
But, the real problem is that hundreds of thousands of government employees are being forced through compulsory union dues to subsidize Lee Saunders liberal agenda that is often far from what most Americans want.
It’s time to free all employees from being shackled by decades-old forced-union representation agreements that take money from paychecks of hardworking Americans to spend on political agendas that they oppose.
(Who is AFSCME? According to AFSCME, it is the nation’s largest and fastest growing government employees union with more than 1.6 million working and retired members.)
IGUA union officials provided contradictory information on amount a Master Security guard must pay the union to keep a job
Jewish MIT students assert their rights under Civil Rights Act by requesting religious exemptions from funding union, but union officials continue to demand dues payments
Thanks to the Committee's election-year program, union-label candidates like Sen. Jon Tester (Mont.) are being given a choice: pledge to change course and support Right to Work going forward, or face the potential political consequences.