Bill Would End Legalized Big Labor Sabotage
By the time actual employees learn that Big Labor salts’ promises of better pay, benefits, and working conditions were empty, the salts are long gone.
Foundation staff attorneys recently filed an amicus brief with the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in a case challenging a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) decision reversing workers’ attempt to remove union “representation” they oppose.
In the case, J.G. Kern employees, frustrated with the United Auto Workers (UAW) Local 228 union, decided to petition to decertify, or formally remove, the union from their workplace. The workers presented this majority petition to their employer, leading to the company removing its recognition of the union. […]
“The NLRB’s blatant disregard for the rights of workers who don’t want anything to do with coercive unionism is on full display in this case,” commented Mark Mix, president of the National Right to Work Foundation. “The arbitrary cherry-picking of legal precedents to fit the Board’s agenda is outrageous, while expected, given the Biden Administration’s all-out effort to expand Big Labor’s coercive ranks.
NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION
All contents from this article were originally published on the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Website.
If you have questions about whether union officials are violating your rights, contact the Foundation for free help. To take action by supporting The National Right to Work Committee and fueling the fight against Forced Unionism, click here to donate now.
By the time actual employees learn that Big Labor salts’ promises of better pay, benefits, and working conditions were empty, the salts are long gone.
Majority of Lyndhurst Medieval Times cast members signed petition asking Labor Board for election to remove AGVA union, but union is stalling vote
RWDSU rejected twice by Alabama Amazon L’Oreal USA Products workers; union may soon also lose power over large unit of beauty company employees