A ‘Duty to Bargain’ Over Employees’ Freedom?!
"Vullo makes it clear that using the threat of federal prosecution to force any employer to put employees’ Right to Work on the bargaining table violates the First Amendment.”
While nothing is set in stone, this TradingMarkets.com article highlights the attraction of Right to Work states for employment opportunities. No doubt about it, if your state wants to attract jobs, then it should pass right to work laws.
Spokesman Bob Klein said by e-mail last week said the current economy was not the only economic consideration at work. The company is looking at long-term competitiveness.
Going south?
Boyd said that the trend for company relocation within the United States has been from the North to the South, where a big attraction is Right-to-Work laws in southern states.
Right-to-Work allows companies more flexibility in handling labor issues than in non Right-to-Work states.
Right-to-Work refers to a worker being able to work at a company without necessarily joining a union when one is in place, which puts less power in the hands of unions.
One example is that a company can be more flexible in moving workers from one job to another.
"Vullo makes it clear that using the threat of federal prosecution to force any employer to put employees’ Right to Work on the bargaining table violates the First Amendment.”
“Under the FLCA [...] monopolistic union contracts would be imposed on employees and business owners after only 120 days of negotiation."
"If Big Labor succeeds in pushing the FLCA through the House, as expected, the Committee will go all out to stop it in the Senate.”