Government Union Czars Lose in Federal Court
Mark Mix: President Trump was “right to issue E.O.14251,” which is a significant step in the right direction.
An Oregon law that gags business owners from discussing the costs and effects of unionization is being challenged in court.
SB 519, which takes effect in January, was pushed by the Oregon AFL-CIO violates the employer’s right to communicate with employees.
“The United States Supreme Court has recognized that employee free choice is insured by an open and robust debate about whether to join a union,” said Scott Oborne, the Portland managing partner with Jackson Lewis. “The end result of SB 519 is that employees can be left in the dark as to their rights and options as far as organizing.”
The new law will change the landscape of union organizing in Oregon and — if not overturned — could set a precedent for labor law nationwide, according to the law firm.
Mark Mix: President Trump was “right to issue E.O.14251,” which is a significant step in the right direction.
Brief emphasizes President’s authority under both Constitution and federal law to reduce scope of union monopoly bargaining control
For years, Democrat nominee Abigail Spanberger has made it clear she’s ready to throw away Virginia’s reputation as job creation-friendly in order to please her Big Labor patrons.