DC-Area Transdev Driver Takes Case Regarding Union-Instigated Assault to Federal Appeals Court
Biden Labor Board claims ATU union did not violate law even after Transdev worker experienced slap and termination attempt from union officials
West Virginia’s Paycheck Protection law states that employees must provide written consent to allow union officers to take money from workers’ paychecks and put it toward political donations. Union officials want to overturn this law and they are attempting to takeaway this right from workers.
The Supreme Court stopped this and overturned a lower court’s injunction. West Virginia’s Paycheck Protection law will remain in place, thanks to the Supreme Court ruling protecting employees’ First Amendment rights.
In The Center Square, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation President Mark Mix is quoted on the matter:
“West Virginia’s Paycheck Protection law properly takes the government out of the union dues collection business, and in the process helps ensure that no union payments are taken from public employees in violation of their First Amendment rights recognized in Janus,” Foundation President Mark Mix said in a statement.
“The Supreme Court of Appeals made the right decision by reversing the Circuit Court’s injunction which was issued under the outrageous premise that union bosses have a legal right to use taxpayer-funded government payroll systems to divert workers’ money into union coffers.”
MARK MIX, AS QUOTED IN THE CENTER SQUARE
If you have questions about whether union officials are violating your rights, contact the Foundation for free help. To take action by supporting The National Right to Work Committee and fueling the fight against Forced Unionism, click here to donate now.
Biden Labor Board claims ATU union did not violate law even after Transdev worker experienced slap and termination attempt from union officials
NY Starbucks workers are challenging NLRB that refuses to let them hold decertification votes to remove unwanted SBWU union
Foundation attorneys argue before the Arizona Supreme Court and Texas Supreme Court that Janus’ ban on forcing public workers to fund union activities shows why state constitutions forbid the same coercion applied to taxpayers.